Authentication of Pisco

Type of Applications:

From origin to alcohol content with Raman spectroscopy

Validating authenticity, purity, alcohol content, and safety are common problems in the lucrative alcoholic beverage market, particularly when pricing is dependent on origin, variety, or alcohol content. The industry relies heavily on expert tasters and time-consuming analytical laboratory testing to combat substitution and adulteration, and needs better tools for field testing. Raman spectroscopy is stepping up to close this gap for Pisco, a premium Peruvian liquor, and has excellent potential to do the same for other spirits. Here we describe how one group at The Ohio State University are using 1064 nm Raman spectroscopy to distinguish between pure varieties and mixtures, and even identify the specific grape varietal. In addition to offering superior discrimination over UV-VIS, Raman also allowed quantification of both ethanol and methanol content in pisco, making it a well-rounded tool for quality assessment of spirits.        Download this tech tip

What is Pisco?

Pisco is a liquor (technically a brandy) fermented originating from Peru, and steadily growing in popularity worldwide. Pisco first made its name in the United States in the days of the California Gold Rush, brought by traders from Peru and immortalized by the likes of Mark Twain and Rudyard Kipling. In recent years it has begun to enjoy a reprise in the form of artisan cocktails. In Peru, however, pisco is much more. It is the national drink, a key export, and important enough to Peruvian culture to merit its own holiday each July. Production of pisco in Peru grew 34% between 2011 and 2015 (i), and is forecasted to be at >14 million liters by 2025 (ii).

This colorless or slightly amber liquor is made from grapes developed and cultivated along the coasts of Peru, and varies in alcohol content from 38% to 48%. The production of Pisco is closely regulated by the National Institute for the Defense of Competition and the Protection of Intellectual Property (INDECOPI), which grants the official status of “Pisco” only when the liquor is produced in certain regions using specific varietals of grapes, and only under the provision that the traditional production practices have been used. With demand for Pisco growing worldwide, rapid analytical techniques are needed to ensure authenticity and deter attempts at counterfeiting.

Pisco production chart
Pisco production in Peru, 2000-2014, reproduced with permission from ‘Consequential life cycle assessment of pisco production in the Ica Valley, Peru’, Ian Vázquez-Rowe, Life Cycle Management Conference, Luxembourg, 2017.

Pisco may be distilled from a single aromatic grape varietal (Italia, Torontel, Albilla, Moscatel) or non-aromatic grape (Quebranta, Negra Criolla, Uvina), or it may be a mixture. These blends (called pisco acholado) make use of the more common Quebranta grape and are made from closely guarded recipes, much like the blended whiskies of Scotland. Each Pisco carries its own Protected Denomination of Origin (PDO) which lays claim to the grape(s) and purity of its composition.

Since assessment of the authenticity of PDO claims must be performed by tasting experts, pisco is very prone to adulteration, particularly for the more expensive pure aromatics. Inexpensive blends may be passed off as pure, or a less prestigious grape may be substituted. No analytical or reference method has been established to validate the grape varietal, leaving a gap in efforts to deter counterfeiting.

Establishing authenticity of origin

Spectroscopy has become an indispensable tool for testing both quality and authenticity of foods and beverages. With this in mind, PhD student Ahmed Menevseoglu at The Ohio State University decided to test the applicability of UV-VIS and Raman spectroscopy to validating the PDO of pisco. “My supervisor, Luis Rodriguez-Saona, is from Peru,” he says, “and so he knew of the importance of this problem.”

The study included three grape varietals: aromatic Italia (n=9) and Torontel (n=9) and non-aromatic Quebranta (n=16). Pisco samples originating from the Ica and Lima regions of Peru were collected for each grape, courtesy of the Universidad Nacional Agraria (Lima, Peru) and several local markets. Samples decanted into cuvette were measured using direct UV-VIS transmittance (200-400 nm) on a benchtop dual-beam spectrometer, followed by Raman spectroscopy with 1064 nm excitation using a Wasatch Photonics integrated Raman system with quick-fit cuvette holder (WP 1064L). The Raman system reported spectra for 250-1850 cm-1 with 11 cm-1 resolution (50 µm slit), and measurements were made at 2000 ms integration time with 3 averages. “We tried 830 nm Raman first,” says Ahmed, “but it didn’t give good results. We changed to 1064 nm and optimized the probe distance and how we took the background – it made a big difference in the results.”

Raman spectra with WP 1064L
1064 nm Raman spectra of three unique pisco samples made from Italia, Quebranta, and Torontel grapes, measured with the WP 1064L system).

Spectra were then analyzed using pattern recognition by Soft Independent Modeling of Class Analogies (SIMCA) in an effort to classify the pisco samples, with a focus on the 990-1530 cm-1 spectral region for Raman. Each method – Raman and UV-VIS – was able to accurately discriminate aromatic from non-aromatic varieties, however, Raman provided the clearest discrimination between aromatics, non-aromatics, and mixtures by far. Raman was also the only method to provide clear discrimination between the two aromatic varietals, allowing pisco made from Torontel grapes to be identified versus Italia grapes.

SIMCA score charts
SIMCA score class projections for (a) Raman (WP 1064L) and (b) UV-VIS, (dual-beam benchtop system) showing the ability of each method to separate aromatic from non-aromatic grape varietals, and further discrimination of exact grape varietal by Raman spectroscopy.

The Wasatch Photonics Raman system was also much simpler to use, particularly as compared to other vibrational spectroscopy techniques like FTIR that required evaporation of the solvent. “It’s so easy,” said Ahmed. “It’s fast, reliable, and it’s so easy to use. No sample preparation is needed. The equipment is not heavy – very easy to carry anywhere. It’s also easy to set up the system and use the software.”

Quantifying ethanol & methanol content

As a second phase, the study explored the ability of Raman spectroscopy to determine ethanol and methanol content in Pisco. The PDO requirements on pisco mandate 38-48% alcohol content, which could tempt less scrupulous producers or suppliers to supplement weaker products with methanol. While low levels of methanol are present naturally, and even allowed up to 150 ppm, higher levels can cause a variety of serious symptoms including vomiting, decreased consciousness, and loss of sight. Rapid, direct analytical measurement of both ethanol and methanol in the field would allow authorities to ensure both product authenticity and safety for consumers.

A Partial Least Squares Regression (PLSR) model was developed to predict the ethanol and methanol content based on spectral differences within the sample set and levels measured using a reference GC method, and was found to have excellent correlation with the known contents. Correlation of the predicted alcohol content was very good with the measured values, showing excellent promise for prediction of ethanol content from 44 to 24 % and methanol from 0.5 % to not detectable using 1064 nm Raman spectroscopy.

A Raman authentication success story

PLSR correlation plots
PLSR correlation plots for determination of (a) ethanol and (b) methanol in Pisco using a WP 1064L Raman system.

Raman spectroscopy is a powerful tool for the authentication and analysis of foods and beverages, and its performance here for authenticating protected denomination of origin (PDO) of Pisco is no exception. By using the optimum excitation wavelength for this material (1064 nm), Raman spectroscopy was able to rapidly and effectively discriminate between grape varietals in Pisco at all levels: aromatic vs non-aromatic, and even the specific grape varietal (Italia vs Torontel). Furthermore, Raman spectroscopy demonstrated excellent predictive ability for the measurement of ethanol content for regulatory purposes, and of methanol content for protection of consumer safety. These capabilities combined make it a very promising tool for rapid authentication of pisco in the field for the protection of this unique spirit, as well as those who enjoy it.

Many thanks to Dr. Luis Rodriguez-Saona and Ahmed Meneseovglu of The Ohio State University for sharing their research. View the full award-winning poster as presented by Ahmed Meneseovglu of The Ohio State University at IFT 2018, or learn more about the research in Dr. Luis Rodriguez-Saona’s group at OSU.

(i) http://elcomercio.pe/economia/peru/produce-produccion-pisco-marco-record-historico-2015-noticia-1876498 Produce: Producción de pisco marcó récord histórico en 2015

(ii) http://lcm-conferences.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/presentations/Wednesday/WE-204/5.CLCA%20PISCO%20LCM2017%20FINAL.pdf